(Discourse) It’s not the best tech. solution for wider engagement
Totally agree, Discourse is more like a technical working forum rather than a general all purpose forum.
and that is where we are going with the website in general - to make the DAO more accessible.
On the website yes, but for me this is not a direct interactive social tool to engage with people, you can certainly find help / resources and so on: not saying it’s not important.
Discord is not as common outside of the gamer/web3 world so the forum issue remains a challenge for web2 natives.
Yes, while Discord is great, it’s a chat not a forum (yes also with its own demography) and you can’t have long lasting topics discussion easily on a chat.
Reddit seems like it should be effective, but we’re not seeing a lot of activity there as far as I have seen.
I can keep the sub updated, it’s not much work, can’t hurt.
You’ll see in June some new initiatives to reach out to that wider audience both in messaging on social media, but also in the engagement tools we will be developing for Member Services in the coming months, and of course the Ambassador Program.
Looking forward!
Discourse is intended to be for token holders and is token gated, and is really focused on the operations of the DAO.
That’s the part where I disagree a bit, imo you try to draw a line (I say this in a general term, I have this feeling about Vitadao sometime) when it should all be merged and more accessible to everyone, then you can gate voting or limit some access features to tokens holders for instance (but agreed again on the Discourse argument). I sometimes feel we work between ourselves and nobody outside know about it.