An immediate question for the proposer is: how does this proposal relate to the existing processes established by the Squad as governed by SG 0.3c? Shouldn’t you explain in this proposal which processes would be invalidated, at the very least? After all, we want token holders to make the most informed decisions, correct?
Another question is about:
Onboarding and offboarding of VITA-FAST stewards will follow standard procedures outlined in VitaDAO governance
This doesn’t seem to follow the logic in the first part of the proposal. The stewards (or Project Leads, as we call them in the Commercialization Squad currently) are appointed and fired by the Squad once the proposal to do so is ratified by VitaDAO Stewards. Could you explain to the reader how your proposal for onboarding and offboarding would work in real life?