Summary VitaDAO has been operating for just over a year, and as part of feedback received by working group members individually and through a series of internal discussions, we propose to adjust spending authorization limits and sign-off authority to establish better accountability and responsibilit…

Would working group expenses in either spec be transparent to the rest of the community?

They would be transparent to the extent they are now - any token holder can ask about any expense of the DAO and we would provide that information. Projects usually have budgets attached to the proposals.

I have a few comments regarding bookkeeping and overall transparency. Shortly, I don’t think the DAO expenses are transparent enough presently. On EtherScan, I see hundreds of thousands of VITA being moved around in a single day. What’s it for? Is it compensation for work? Is it project-related tran…

@rpill Many of the expenses are driven by governance, but unless you specifically ask, the blockchain doesn’t provide enough context as you mention. Starting in 2023, there will be more frequent reports, as we have been working with vendors to finally have a better reporting module for tagging and …

VDP-66 Proposal to Adjust Spending Authorization Limits and Authority

Proposals Passed Proposals

Topic		Replies	Views
VDP-9: Empowering Working Group Budgets Archived Proposals	11	932	September 5, 2022
VitaDAO Governance VitaDAO Constitution	2	1949	January 10, 2023
VDP-1 VitaDAO Governance Framework Passed Proposals	14	4234	July 11, 2021
VDP-69 Proposal to Realign Working Group Structures Passed Proposals	2	1432	December 9, 2022
VDP-3 VitaDAO Tokenomics Proposal Passed Proposals	28	6371	July 15, 2021

VDP-66 Proposal to Adjust Spending Authorization Limits and Authority

Related topics