Summary VitaDAO is a global collective on a mission to fund novel longevity research and democratize IP - making it accessible to patients across the globe. Vita will acquire early-stage IP assets and finance data creation to potentially advance these assets to the clinic. Our core goal is to bridge…

The core difference is that SPs helped build VitaDAOs core infrastructure for WGs to emerge on. The goal with this token economic distribution is for WGs to take over infrastructure development. IMO in many cases the work that SPs have delivered, including their teams who receive salaries, is dispr…

VDP 3.1 Tokenomics Proposal Amendment Based on final input from the community, VitaDAO is putting up the following genesis tokenomics for vote by VITA genesis token holders based on feedback on VDP3: VDP-3 VitaDAO Tokenomics Proposal . The allocations below differentiate minimally from VDP3 but aim…

I’m not convinced sufficient information has been presented to make a qualified decision on the proposed token allocations. For the DAO to make such decisions on an informed basis, the contribution of each party should be more transparent. This is particularly important, as the amount due to be di…

[image] Senso: Having followed every post on Discord and Telegram for well over a month, it is unclear how each party listed in this proposal has contributed to the DAO This is a very valid concern, I agree with your there. I’ll need to think about how to best resolve this and share my though…

[image] theobtl: Fully agree. The question of If and how to open up working group channels is an ongoing discussion and could resolve this partially. The current idea is to open up all working groups at least as read-only channels, except two that are potentially sensitive (legal and deal negoti…

Thank you @Senso for raising these questions! I think we are all aligned with the longevity of this DAO (pun intended) and we’re not planning to sell. I’d like to hear ideas from the whole community on how we could have lock-ups that allow voting but not selling. Of course, we can unlock a small % …

I really like the idea of distributing a certain proportion of tokens that allow voting but not selling during this pivotal early phase. If a working group member does not intend to sell in the short term, such a lock-up shouldn’t make a difference to that person. However, it will instill a sense of…

[image] longevion: I’d like to hear ideas from the whole community on how we could have lock-ups that allow voting but not selling. Of course, we can unlock a small % of the vested tokens to be sold, just for regular salary-like expenses, especially for those of us that are focused on this full …

Regarding opening up WG convos… I might be in the minority here but I believe the privacy of WG convos is more important than “opening them up.” Typically when small, specialized groups of people have a safe and specific space to talk, they are more candid about the options and strategy and are abl…

VDP-3 VitaDAO Tokenomics Proposal

Proposals Passed Proposals

Topic		Replies	Views
VDP-1 VitaDAO Governance Framework Passed Proposals	14	4239	July 11, 2021
VitaDAO Governance VitaDAO Constitution	2	1951	January 10, 2023
VitaDAO Tokenomics & Treasury VitaDAO Constitution	3	1291	August 22, 2022
VDP-11 New 10% VITA Mint for Treasury & Strategic Contributors Passed Proposals	28	3296	January 19, 2022
VDP-2 VitaDAO Incentive Proposal Passed Proposals	19	2863	September 12, 2021

VDP-3 VitaDAO Tokenomics Proposal

Related topics