VDP-73 [Governance]: Fractionalization of ApoptoSENS IP-NFT

Proposals Archived Proposals
4

Thanks so much for the thoughtful questions @Gonza !!!

  1. No. The USDC will not be recovered. If FAM holders vote on returning the rest of the treasury back to FAM holders (for any reason), that could be done. The idea with the burn is that you as a VITA holder must signal your confidence in FAM, and you demonstrate that by locking the VITA. If new data emerges or for any other reason you stop believing in FAM, you may burn the FAM to signal that and reclaim the VITA (which can be locked in another fractionalized IP-NFT). Over time, we hope that VITA locking signals which IP-NFTs the community has the greatest confidence in.
  2. Another excellent question and thank you for asking. This exact point is something FAM holders can and should vote on as early as possible. There are a few options for FAM holdings: 1) any amount of FAM gets full data access, 2) varying levels of data access based on FAM holdings. There are also options with NDA requirements: 1) NDA required, 2) NDA not required. FAM holdings and NDA can also be used in any combination as well. My suggestion would be to institute just an NDA requirement, to allow people to perform diligence without forcing them to buy in, for what it’s worth.
  3. In my personal opinion, I disagree that we should do it just because it was the first project VitaDAO invested in. CAR-NK cells have been doing very well in the clinic, and if Amit’s project generates promising data, it certainly has a chance at being a venture-backed startup. Curious what @scienceman thinks though :slight_smile:

Thanks again for your great questions and all of these are opinions and very open to others as well.

5 Likes