# VDP-52 stewards election proposal options **URL:** \ **Category:** Archived Proposals\ **Created:** [July 14, 2022, 2:53pm UTC](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-52-stewards-election-proposal-options/761 "2022-07-14T14:53:54Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 14
**Author:** ![theobtl](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gov.vitadao.com/theobtl/32/13_2.png) [@theobtl](https://gov.vitadao.com/u/theobtl)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2022, 6:43pm UTC](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-52-stewards-election-proposal-options/761/14 "2022-07-22T18:43:26Z")
You’re right that, as of right now, [VDP-19 Stewardship Process](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-19-stewardship-process/479) is the only governance on the stewardship (re)elections that is _in effect_. [VDP-36 Stewardship Process Amendment #1](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-36-stewardship-process-amendment-1/564), [VDP-51 Stewardship election [counter proposal]](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-51-stewardship-election-counter-proposal/759) and [VDP-52 stewards election proposal options](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-52-stewards-election-proposal-options/761) (this proposal) are all in governance right now and, of course, _not yet in effect_. That said, based on our current governance framework as defined in [VDP-1 VitaDAO Governance Framework](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-1-vitadao-governance-framework/40) and subsequent amendments, I believe there everyone has the right to propose another VDP that changes these rules. While I personally would prefer to stick to VDP-19, we’ll have to see how this proposal develops and, if it passes snapshot before August 1, see what this means. For me it is out of question that we need to fundamentally revisit the construct of VitaCore, the roles of stewards and how all of these roles and authorities are always held accountable to the DAO, act transparently and subject to change by the preferences of the DAO. --- _[View the full topic](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-52-stewards-election-proposal-options/761)._