# VDP-19 Stewardship Process

**URL:** <https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-19-stewardship-process/479>\
**Category:** Passed Proposals\
**Created:** [December 23, 2021, 8:54pm UTC](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-19-stewardship-process/479 "2021-12-23T20:54:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theobtl](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/gov.vitadao.com/theobtl/32/13_2.png) [@theobtl](https://gov.vitadao.com/u/theobtl)\
**Post date:** [December 29, 2021, 5:33pm UTC](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-19-stewardship-process/479/4 "2021-12-29T17:33:29Z")

</div>

Thanks a lot for the amendments, @timrpeterson, agree with both of your points. I’ve rephrased the Specification section and linked to definitions in our [FAQ](https://gov.vitadao.com/c/faq/12) for WG stewards and Vitacore (which has a link to the definition of service providers in it).

You’re also making good points on the responsibilities and rights of working group stewards to manage budgets and authorise expenses. If we need new or more detailed definitions on that, we should probably revise [VDP-6](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-6-vitadao-working-group-projects-framework/267) or amend [VDP-9](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-9-empowering-working-group-budgets/364) which is still in phase 2 on Discourse. As it stands, VDP-6 defines the role of stewards as follows:

> Within a certain threshold (I propose 2’500 USD), the two working group stewards (two) will approve the Project Proposal.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gov.vitadao.com/t/vdp-19-stewardship-process/479)._