This proposal outlines the transition of VitaDAO to a new organizational structure, VitaDAO 2.0, which combines high-stake monitorship with decentralized autonomous execution, enhancing operational efficiency, maintaining strategic alignment, and promoting scalable growth. Authors: @alexdobrin , @P…

Looking good! Excited about the future of VitaDAO with this new structure. It is amazing to see clear accountability amongst the members with the greatest impact on the organization with the implementation of this structure. All for that! Just one question: The following is mentioned as part of …

Solid proposal. Love the focus on Web3 and transparency—highly needed in today’s times.

[image] alexdobrin: Transparency and Governance: Create live dashboards for enhanced transparency and accountability, accessible to community members at all time Love this, OBRA and clear KPIs. I think it is also important to remember that VitaDAO is first a DAO so I agree with the renewed…

Longevity • Advance and Launch IPTs o Source high-quality academic projects with commercial potential o Incubate in partnership with other actors in the ecosystem (e.g., Catalyst) projects that are not ready yet for commercialization o Assess in a timely and thorough manner projects that can ach…

[image] ADMelhede: following is mentioned as part of the longevity p Thank you for your question. This relates to VitaDAO’s Members Portal. The proposal is to have it as a cross-pod initiative really, with the Web3 Pod responsible for developing the tech and designing a crypto-native UX while…

[image] alexdobrin: While Pod Leads can serve as Guardians, this is not a hard a requirement. Guardians hire & fire Pod Leads Guardians are setting the budgets for Pods and have veto rights Allowing someone to be Guardian and Pod Lead at the same time is a clear conflict of interest, partic…

Perfect, thanks! This was also what I thought it might mean :slight_smile:

[image] alexdobrin: Ongoing initiatives like The Longevist, Ambassadors Program, etc, will also automatically fall under one of the new Pods and budgeting shall be reevaluated by the lead. For gap periods where there’s no assigned lead for a given Pod, all initiatives underneath that Pod shall b…

Pods sounds better than “committees”.

Schmackofant raises valid points, especially that someone can be Guardian and Pod lead at the same time. I voiced it previously that it should be either or, but not both. Otherwise too much control and power will be in the hands of a few single individuals, as for most part guardians will be pod le…

VDP-148 Blueprint for Sustainable Growth: Operationalizing VitaDAO’s New Mandate

Proposals Active Proposals

ADMelhede June 20, 2024, 11:19am 8

Perfect, thanks! This was also what I thought it might mean

Topic		Replies	Views
VitaDAO Governance VitaDAO Constitution	2	1991	January 10, 2023
VDP-1 VitaDAO Governance Framework Passed Proposals	14	4340	July 11, 2021
VDP-3 VitaDAO Tokenomics Proposal Passed Proposals	28	6563	July 15, 2021
VitaDAO Governance Amendment #2 Archived Proposals	12	1743	March 4, 2022
VDP-60 Seasonal Governance Passed Proposals	11	1886	November 30, 2022

VDP-148 Blueprint for Sustainable Growth: Operationalizing VitaDAO’s New Mandate

Related topics