Summary This proposal is a continuation and amendment of VDP-5, in participation with the Morten Scheibye-Knudsen Lab (MSK) , which includes the description of the project’s first two phases and funding for Phase I, approved by tokenholders on July 7th 2021 at 0xc05fee6528ff8ec18a847b08bdc19b43f6edc8…

There is not a lot of background/rationale in the proposal for the proposed decisions. Were the data published? From what I can see on the old proposal, the old roadmap suggested a Series A around now. Is there a revised roadmap/plan for Phase II and beyond? Only two experiments beyond the scope i…

I agree with a good amount of the comments in the sense that there might be more information needed on a bit more specifics on what will be needed for phase 2, what the use of proceeds will entail and what will the timeline for that look like? As these seem to be outside of the original agreement wh…

The proposal seems to be missing the “Senior Review Digest - Qualitative.” It’s challenging for the community to make an informed decision without it. After all, what’s the purpose of the Longevity Working Group if not to provide such insights? Regarding the sale of 25% of the IP-NFT, should th…

Hi @bowtiedshrike @popozaoc @SimiKol , thank you for your valuable comments and questions. We are reviewing them and taking them into account for a revised version of the proposal.

It seems like the proposal was voted down. I suggest splitting the proposal into multiple ones for better clarity. When will the “Senior Review Digest” be published?

I’d like to understand the reasoning behind the original proposal instead of just getting a new one. Can we discuss the logic of the initial idea?

My apologies @popozaoc and @bowtiedshrike this reply was attributed to the wrong OP. [image] bowtiedshrike: Were the data published? The data is unpublished. We have not filed IP yet, as that will happen when we get closer to a clinical trial. The key thing that was achieved in Phase I was t…

[image] timrpeterson: Yes. It will involve a third party to reduce to practice the IP that was envisioned from this project. Phase II will be for another 2? years? How much will be the subaward from Copenhagen to the third party to reduce the IP to practice vs funding ongoing work in the lab?…

I’ve been around the DAO block for 4 years and I value transparency. This proposal has me puzzled – it’s not as clear as what we’re used to. Let’s shed some light on it. I’m all for giving it a chance, but we need more info to make a good call. Honestly, it’s got me thinking about dumping my stake …

Hi @gustavian . Sorry for the delay. A revised proposal is forthcoming. We are sourcing additional feedback from our scientific advisory board and other experienced entrepreneurs.

VDP-125 Proposal to Advance Scheibye-Knudsen Lab IP-NFT Asset

Proposals

timrpeterson November 21, 2023, 6:42pm 12

Revision just launched. Please vote. VDP-125 - Rework - Scheibye-Knudsen Lab IP-NFT Asset

Topic		Replies	Views
VDP-125 - Rework - Scheibye-Knudsen Lab IP-NFT Asset Proposals	5	523	November 30, 2023
VDP-100 (Fractionalization of Newcastle-Korolchuk IP-NFT) Passed Proposals	21	2225	May 24, 2023
SG 0.3b - Molecule Dealflow and Development Services Community Proposals	2	995	March 11, 2023
VDP-73 [Governance]: Fractionalization of ApoptoSENS IP-NFT Archived Proposals	39	2083	March 27, 2023
VDP-138 - Deciding VitaDAO’s next IPT Proposals	4	425	January 15, 2024

VDP-125 Proposal to Advance Scheibye-Knudsen Lab IP-NFT Asset

Related topics