VitaDAO V1 Governance Framework Initial Launch Governance Framework Proposal User Types Members A member of the VitaDAO is anyone who holds $VITA, VItaDAO’s token, and has $VITA staked into the staking contract. Tokens can be obtained by providing funds or work to the structure. Members have full g…

Great first draft! Good job putting this together! A few comments. It is only implicitly implied that number of votes is directly related to number of $VITA tokens and that a minimum of 1 is required. It would be good to clarify this, i.e. that 1 token = 1 vote. But I would also suggest that we…

Regarding Phase 1, it simply means 10 individual community members need to support. Could be likes in a poll. Same for Phase 2. Only Phase 3 is a token-based vote.

Some excellent feedback from Patrick Rawson: As mentioned before I don’t owning tokens should be the only means of becoming a member. There’s two reasons: (1) If you guys are going the route of unincorporated partnership, this broadens the definition of DAO members so widely as to include persons …

Edited to reduce quorum from 10 to 5%

[image] tylergolato: Edited to reduce quorum from 10 to 5% That seems sensible. Some major existing DAOs have participation rates of as low as 2-3%, such as Aragon AGPs. Pat from Curve Labs pointed that out too. Since I suspect that VitaDAO will have a smaller, yet more engaged community than…

[image] theobtl: In the longer term, we could potentially increase voter turnout by implementing a way to delegate votes. agree, delegation should be something to focus on closely after the launch

This may be critical: Currently, the idea is that proposals in phase 3 (on-chain) have a fixed point in time when the voting period ends. [image] VitaDAO: Phase 3 Duration: 14 days We may want to introduce a safety mechanism that avoids strategic last-minute votes flipping the vote. Meaning, …

[image] theobtl: If so, are either or both proposed solutions a critical feature or can this wait until after launch? My suggestion here is to (1) push forward and (2) aggregate these types of features in a requisites sheet for “Governance v2” that Curve Labs or multiple SPs can execute on.

This proposal is now in phase 2 (following the specification in this very proposal - so meta!) and will remain so for approximately 2-3 weeks until our governance infrastructure is ready to be deployed on-chain (as it is still under development). In the meantime, there is now a Discourse poll to cas…

VDP-1 VitaDAO Governance Framework

Proposals Passed Proposals

Topic		Replies	Views
VitaDAO Governance VitaDAO Constitution	2	1976	January 10, 2023
VDP-3 VitaDAO Tokenomics Proposal Passed Proposals	28	6484	July 15, 2021
VDP-93 [Governance]: Proposal to Revise Governance Workflow Active Proposals	21	1420	June 20, 2023
VitaDAO Governance Amendment #2 Archived Proposals	12	1701	March 4, 2022
VDP-37 VitaDAO Governance Amendment #2 Archived Proposals	34	3551	August 8, 2022

VDP-1 VitaDAO Governance Framework

Related topics