Summary This proposal establishes an internal independent working group within VitaDAO. It describes the Group’s purpose, goals, and rationale for its activities. This proposal does not seek the creation of new salaried positions in addition to the ones the DAO is already hiring for. PLEASE NOTE: …

I am personally super excited about this becoming a focused squad. I know from long experience in consumer tech that the most important thing to accelerate a system is to complete the first full loops of that system. This is because: 1. As you point out, this proves to everyone that the vision of th…

This looks like a plan to make $Vita a security. Given the amount of biotech in the US that is funded, it would be good if we can articulate here why it remains NOT a security-- but the proposal reads like a common venture to drive profits.

Love the general initiative and pro-activeness Eli, as well as range of ideas!! It currently entails a bunch of different initiatives, which might sense to separate out a bit into separate proposals and squads? Think for the trial period where no budget outside of whats already governed is demanded…

Echo your point on that the squad and specific initiatives should undergo legal review and gov votes (informed on written legal analysis, based on which the dao members can make a vote), so the DAO ensures to stay a gov token

Interesting thought, @bowtiedshrike . To make a general statement first: this proposal does not say “we won’t talk to legal before doing stuff”. Rest assured that legal will have a critical role in any token-related initiatives, just like before. Please see goal 8 of the squad, as well as the descr…

Thanks @EliMo . We seemed to have moved away from WGs having autonomy to implement their own budgets. In general I’m not happy with the consolidation down to 3 WGs. It centralizes what we’re trying to do. I’d like to see this returned to how it was before with a Steward in charge of each of them. Th…

Hi all, @Ageless_Partners pointed to “token utility”, as used in the proposal, needing a bit of explanation. When we talk about token utility, we mean the utility value of the token to the DAO members, e.g. qualifying for partner discounts, access to services, etc. It does not refer to the monetary…

I think it’s important to remember that VitaDAO’s decentralized model encourages proposals as ideas from the entire community, including by people not familiar with securities laws, and as a result does not imply an intent by VitaDAO to act on any of these ideas. We hash these out before bothering l…

Thanks a lot for the analysis. Did you see my last comment? When we talk about token utility, we mean the utility value of the token to the DAO members, e.g. qualifying for partner discounts, access to services, etc. It does not refer to the monetary value of the token. You are right, we should…

Seems like the recent update messed something up, because it’s not letting me edit the proposal - will work on that in the morning.

SG 0.3a - Commercialization Squad

Seasonal Governance Community Proposals

EliMo March 3, 2023, 5:44am 13

Yes, you’re right. Tried to do it now, but Discourse hates me for some reason.

EDIT: updated!

Topic		Replies	Views
VDP-3 VitaDAO Tokenomics Proposal Passed Proposals	28	6374	July 15, 2021
SG 0.2a - Market analysis and user research to enhance understanding of $VITA token holder and VitaDAO member needs Community Proposals	14	798	March 16, 2023
VDP-137: Hiring a Chief Scientific Officer (CSO) for VitaDAO Proposals	23	920	January 17, 2024
VitaDAO Governance VitaDAO Constitution	2	1949	January 10, 2023
VDP-1 VitaDAO Governance Framework Passed Proposals	14	4236	July 11, 2021

SG 0.3a - Commercialization Squad

Related topics